Papers with Multimodal large language models
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current approaches generate visual markers for all questions, generating excessive visual markers. |
| Approach: | They propose a plug-and-play approach that adapts to the complexity of questions . they propose combining fast intuitive judgments with deliberate analytical reasoning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves performance on four benchmarks on ScienceQA, TextQA, VizWiz, and MME. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multimodal large language models are limited to general-purpose multimodal tasks like question-answering on natural images. |
| Approach: | They propose to use cross-modal projection networks and a large language model to model domain-specific visual attributes of MLLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models gain domain-specific visual capabilities when the projection is fine-tuned, but the updates do not extract relevant domain-specific visual attributes. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to eliminate hallucinations require expensive human annotation . hallucination in multimodal large language models poses unique challenges for current research . |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained unlearning framework that performs gradient ascent to eliminate hallucinations without paired data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces hallucinations while preserving quality with modest computational overhead. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) capture semantics of short video content but fail to account for policy-specific details. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates In-prompt Process Supervision into MLLMs . they propose sequential reasoning over ancillary questions during fine-tuning . |
| Outcome: | IPS outperforms baseline MLLMs on public and proprietary benchmarks . replacing human-annotated ancillary labels with MLML-generated ones results in performance degradation. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are at the center of research attention, yet intelligence, limitations, and risks remain insufficiently understood. |
| Approach: | They propose an open multimodal evaluation framework for Russian-spoken architectures . the framework is instruction-based and includes 18 newly constructed evaluation tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides a replicable methodology for constructing multimodal benchmarks in Russian-spoken architectures. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing contextual safety benchmarks are mostly single-turn and miss how malicious intent can emerge gradually or how the same scene can support both benign and exploitative goals. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates contextual safety in multimodal large language models . they observe persistent trade-offs between contextual safety and utility . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model combines multi-turn and multi-switch scenarios to evaluate safety in multimodal large language models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on semantically equivalent textual paraphrases has focused on perturbing image inputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel adversarial paraphrasing task that generates grammatically correct paraphrases that sighed the original query meaning while degrading segmentation performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task outperforms previous methods by up to 2x on ReasonSeg and LLMSeg-40k datasets. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) demonstrate excellent abilities for understanding visual information, but the hallucination remains a challenging problem. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free approach to enhance vision attention sinks to facilitate convergence of the image token attention sink within shallow layers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the convergence of the image token attention sink within shallow layers and strengthens the layer’s focus on the image itself. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models combine visual and textual data for tasks like image captioning and visual question answering. |
| Approach: | They propose temperature scaling and iterative prompt optimization to calibrate MLLMs and enhance model reliability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques improve MLLMs and improve model reliability. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methodologies for multimodal large language models are limited in evaluating objective queries without considering real-world user experiences. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation paradigm shows that it can be used to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that multimodal large language models extract visual features from the final layers of a pretrained Vision Transformer. |
| Approach: | They propose a feature fusion method that strategically incorporates shallower layers . they propose MLLMs that extract visual features from the final layers of a pretrained Vision Transformer . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms deep layers on fine-grained visual tasks . it is the first comprehensive study of visual layer selection for MLLMs . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have enabled LLM-based agents to directly interact with application user interfaces (UIs), enhancing agents’ performance in complex tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel agent framework that prioritizes actions through application programming interfaces over UI actions and facilitates the creation and expansion of APIs through automated exploration of applications. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces task completion time by 65%-70% and cognitive workload by 38%-53% while maintaining accuracy of 97%-98% compared to humans. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multimodal large language models incorporate visual and textual information, but introduces new and complex safety risks. |
| Approach: | They propose a safety reasoning framework that integrates visual modalities into multimodal models to help them resist jailbreak attacks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves model safety while avoiding over-defense . it is based on a large-scale safety reasoning dataset . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can grasp the intention of a question and decomposing it to a series of visual recognition sub-tasks to find out the answer with the help of an agent. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for multimodal large language models to grasp the intention of a question and decompose it into a series of visual recognition sub-tasks to find out the answer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the accuracy of complex video-related questions by 29.6% and 17.2% on CVQA and the existing VQA datasets. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that textual unlearning does not achieve comparable safety performance with image-text alignment. |
| Approach: | They propose to use textual unlearning to align MLLMs with image-text pairs to explain this problem . they construct a visual leakless safety bench with 2.2k image- text pairs to test this problem. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can refuse image-text pairs according to textual queries, leading to unreliable safety evaluations. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models have advanced rapidly, yet most remain English-centric . scaling multilingual multimodal instruction tuning is limited by the scarcity and high cost of non-English image–text supervision. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that decouples multilingual language enhancement from visual alignment by composing complementary task vectors over a shared LLM backbone. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves competitive performance with a fully multimodally trained model using less than 2% of the text data. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to hallucination mitigation ignore heterogeneous behaviors of attention heads . hallucinosity is a critical barrier to multimodal large language models' reliability, authors say . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that quantifies the energetic properties of each attention head during object generation through two potential networks and dynamically adjusts their contributions at inference time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces hallucination rates without fine-tuning the base model while maintaining generation quality. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to mitigate hallucinations generate erroneous or fabricated information. |
| Approach: | They propose a rank-response-based model that annotates pair-reponses and trains alignment algorithms to improve the correspondence between images and text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the DPO method and outperfies existing methods on two MLLMs of different sizes and four widely used benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in visual reasoning and text generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal large language model that captures deeper relationships between images and text . they propose CMIE, which uses a Coexistence Relationship Generation strategy and an AS mechanism to detect misinformation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in detecting out-of-context misinformation. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods require explicit safety labels or contrastive data, yet visual inputs enable harmful outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual self-fulfilling alignment mechanism that fine-tunes vision-language models on neutral VQA tasks without any safety labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces attack success rate, improves response quality, and mitigates over-refusal while preserving general capabilities. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current vital challenges for autonomous agents lie in two aspects: dependence on strong (M)LLMs and insufficient GUI environment modeling. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive cognitive LLM agent with two novel approaches to improve GUI automation performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed agent achieves state-of-the-art performance on AITW and META-GUI benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models have demonstrated promising results in a variety of tasks that combine vision and language. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the ability of models to use contextual information in free-form text to enhance visual comprehension. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to extract and utilize contextual information to improve understanding of images. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often hallucinate due to two relevant phenomena: massive activation phenomenon and positional information decay. |
| Approach: | They propose a token-level intervention strategy that dynamically suppresses irrelevant visual tokens while preserving key contextual signals. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that TokenTruth significantly improves factual consistency across MLLMs on standard image understanding benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MLLMs have proven effective in a wide range of tasks that require complex reasoning and linguistic comprehension, but they are limited to English-based settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a family of Arabic multimodal large language models with strong vision and language capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show strong performance on visual reasoning tasks and language capabilities. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing preference-based approaches fail to address this challenge by exploiting language priors to bypass visual grounding. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages scene graphs as structured visual information to perform controllable structural interventions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves answer accuracy and reasoning faithfulness across seven visual reasoning benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models have shown remarkable performance for cross-modal understanding and generation, yet suffer from severe inference costs. |
| Approach: | They propose to prune redundant tokens in MLLMs to reduce computation and storage costs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces the computational and storage costs of MLLMs by identifying redundant tokens and pruning them. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for knowledge editing in multimodal large language models focus on limited scenarios due to the lack of rigorous definition of multimodal knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a decomposed definition of multimodal knowledge and a benchmark to evaluate it. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reveals that it is difficult to define multimodal knowledge editing in LLMs. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing dataset construction methods fail to cover the complexity of multimodal safety scenarios . lack of a unified evaluation metric makes them unproven . |
| Approach: | They propose a risk-oriented image-oriented self-adaptive dataset construction method for RMS . they automatically generate an RMS dataset comprising 35,610 image–text pairs with guidance responses . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method automatically generates an RMS dataset comprising 35,610 image–text pairs with guidance responses. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing defense methods rely on fine-tuning or inefficient post-hoc interventions, limiting their ability to address novel attacks. |
| Approach: | They propose a decoding-level defense mechanism that employs a lightweight discriminator to iteratively steer the decoding process toward safety. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves safety performance by up to 33.40% without fine-tuning on multiple MLLMs. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused mainly on visual–textual misalignment, leaving largely unexplored the MLLMs’ ability to preserve an original correct answer when confronted with misleading information. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage evaluation pipeline to quantify the response uncertainty phenomenon by eliciting each model’s original response on unperturbed inputs and injecting explicit (false-answer hints) and implicit (contextual contradictions) misleading instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model overturns a correct answer in 65% of cases after receiving a single deceptive cue. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made rapid progress in perception and alignment, but their reasoning ability often lags behind strong text-only LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that transfers reasoning knowledge in the gradient space while preserving multimodal alignment. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on multimodal reasoning benchmarks show that DRIFT outperforms naive merging and standard SFT. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models exhibit a pronounced form of visual sycophantic behavior when they process image inputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a technique that allows multimodal large language models to engage in reflective reasoning and determine whether a user’s instruction is misleading or corrective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model resists misleading instructions but is stubborn even if it is wrong. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multimodal large language models suffer from repetition and omission hallucinations when transferred to text image machine translation task. |
| Approach: | They propose an efficient MLLM named InImageTrans for TiMT and a method for advancing it. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing open-source MLLMs on the MCiT benchmark. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are gaining popularity as partial solutions to the “symbol grounding problem” faced by language models trained on text alone. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multimodal large language models to integrate linguistic representations with data from other modalities to investigate whether they are integrated into a model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are sensitive to visual features like object shape when it is implied by a verbal description of an event. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in multimodal large language models focus on improving performance . however, language prior conflict leads to suboptimal vision-language alignment . |
| Approach: | They propose a method to decouple the alignment process from language prior interference . they use a proxy LLM to detach from language interference during pretraining . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves training performance and generalizes training data. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for multimodal large language models do not capture real-world clinical complexity. |
| Approach: | They evaluate multilingual, multimodal multimodal models of clinical cases with up to 7 distinct visual clinical evidence types per case. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms human models on differential diagnosis (DDx) generation and final diagnosis (FDx) selection. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on text comprehension, but MLLMs lack the ability to integrate visual data over financial visuals. |
| Approach: | They evaluate 21 state-of-the-art multimodal large language models in a zero-shot setting . they use an annotated question–answer pair from eight common financial image modalities . |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark outperforms existing models but trailed financial experts by 14 percentage points. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models have strong performance on visual question answering benchmarks . however, their inference efficiency is severely constrained by the rapidly growing context . |
| Approach: | They propose a modality-decoupled compression method that enables efficient multimodal inference . they propose to evict visual tokens whenever visual grounding is unnecessary . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces the average context length by up to 57% while maintaining comparable performance to the standard MLLM baseline. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multimodal large language models struggle to handle ambiguous emotional expressions and implicit affective cues, which are crucial for affective understanding but largely overlooked. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent framework that integrates a self-reflection module, an emotion-guided visual augmentation module, and a cross-modal verification module to enhance emotion recognition. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments show that MERMAID outperforms existing methods and achieves absolute accuracy gains of 8.70%–27.90% across diverse benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models are increasingly deployed in open-ended, real-world environments where inputs are messy, underspecified, and not always trustworthy. |
| Approach: | They evaluate multimodal large language models in real-world environments where inputs are messy, underspecified, and not always trustworthy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models fail to detect hidden issues even when they possess the necessary perceptual and reasoning skills. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of multimodal large language models focus on passive inference, where seeing is not enough. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate active reasoning in multimodal large language models . they propose to acquire missing evidence and iteratively refine decisions under incomplete information . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on active reasoning than on passive inference settings. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models often exhibit hallucinations that compromise reliability . despite promising performance, these models often display systematic localization errors . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that categorizes model predictions into four distinct types . they propose metric that evaluates alignment between semantic continuity and logits distribution . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework categorizes model predictions into four different types . it reveals nuanced failure modes beyond traditional accuracy metrics . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced from perception tasks to complex multi-step reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards with process-level supervision through automatically collected rubric-based generative rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on six multimodal reasoning benchmarks and significantly improves reasoning faithfulness in dedicated evaluations. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multimodal large language models (MLLMs) face challenges in fine-grained visual tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free hierarchical perception-reasoning framework that enhances fine-grained visual understanding by simulating human perception mechanisms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances fine-grained visual understanding by simulating human perception mechanisms. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to reduce memory usage of multimodal large language models rely on storing large numbers of vision tokens in the key–value cache . however, such compression is typically only applied after all inputs are processed, resulting in high peak memory usage during the prefill stage. |
| Approach: | They propose a sequential input-compression mechanism that enforces a fixed memory budget by performing structure-aware key–value cache compression during the prefill stage. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces peak memory usage while maintaining generative performance with only minimal degradation, enabling more practical and memory-efficient multimodal inference. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in document understanding due to different types of annotation noise in training. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to reduce C&P knowledge conflicts across all tested MLLMs . they propose to use annotation noise to train models to understand document content . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces C&P knowledge conflicts across all tested MLLMs and enhances their performance in both cognitive and perceptual tasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multimodal large language models are trained on single-turn vision question-answering tasks, which do not accurately reflect real-world human conversations. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale multi-turn multimodal dialogue dataset that uses rules and GPT assistance to generate a multi-turned multimodal dialog dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is a strong benchmark for multi-turn multimodal dialogue learning . it features complex dialogues with contextual dependencies that force models to track, ground, and recall information across multiple turns and disparate visual regions. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models generate medical hallucinations due to over-sensitivity to clinical sections. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates structured clinical signals from task-specific radiology expert models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves overall performance on radiology report generation (RRG) on the MIMIC-CXR dataset, it yields up to 17% improvement in RadGraph-F1. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in recent years, yet their ability to perform left–right reasoning in mirror contexts remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate MLLMs' ability to distinguish left from right from a subject-centered perspective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that even the best performing models achieve only 65.40% accuracy, far below the 99.28% accuracy of humans. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shifted visual reasoning from tool-calling to end-to-end perceptionreasoning. |
| Approach: | They synthesize the emerging paradigm of Image-Grounded Chain-of-Thought (IG-CoT) they propose a method-centric taxonomy covering prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a method-centric taxonomy and benchmarks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated compelling visual understanding in recent years. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal large language model with eight visuo-cognitive tasks inspired by classic human intelligence tests organized under a novel A–R–T taxonomy: Abstraction, Relation, and Transformation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed frameworks are based on eight visuo-cognitive tasks inspired by human intelligence tests and organized under a novel A–R–T taxonomy: Abstraction, Relation, and Transformation. |